An AI tool that turns scattered, conflicting design feedback — from Figma, Slack, docs and meetings — into one clear, evidence-backed plan, while the designer stays in control.
An AI that organizes feedback only helps if people actually trust it. These four goals held that tension throughout.
Turn the busywork of collecting and reconciling feedback into the work of deciding.
Every claim should be visible and sourced — never a black box.
The AI proposes with evidence; the designer always makes the call.
One predictable model across tools and teammates — design-system thinking for AI output.
After a review, feedback lands everywhere at once — and the real work, deciding what to change, gets buried under the busywork of gathering it. Three frustrations show up every time.
Across Figma, Slack, docs and meetings — none of it talking to each other.
“Make it bigger” vs. “tone it down,” and nothing flags the clash until it's too late.
Decisions follow whoever spoke last, not the weight of the evidence.
Maya leads two product areas and runs the weekly design review with PMs, engineers and a researcher. She wants to ship confident decisions fast — but loses her mornings reconciling feedback before she can act on any of it.
Mapping Maya's current flow showed exactly where a tool could help — her emotion bottoms out right at “make sense” and “decide.”
Three questions that opened up the design space.
Synthread connects your tools, does the synthesis, and leaves the decision to you.
Connect Figma, Slack, docs & meetings once — feedback flows in automatically.
Group comments into clear themes by meaning, not keywords.
Flag contradictions and show both sides, side by side.
Highlight where people already agree — instant low-risk wins.
Rank by impact, frequency, stakeholder weight & evidence.
Ground recommendations in quoted, linked UX findings.
The AI proposes with evidence.
The human decides.
Because the AI gives direction, it has to prove it. Two mechanisms carry the whole trust story.
Source chips & cited research.
Every theme, priority and suggestion carries a chip showing who said it and where, plus a confidence level — and recommendations quote real UX findings. Users never take the AI's word; they can always trace it back.
“Needs context,” not guesses.
Feedback from docs and meetings has no pin location, so Synthread infers the screen from context — a doc's anchor, a transcript's timestamp, semantic matching. When it isn't sure, it doesn't guess: it flags the comment as low-confidence and asks the designer to assign it.
A restrained, cool “tech” palette with one electric accent — and semantic colors that mean the same thing everywhere.
Connect sources, see feedback pinned on the design, watch chaos become ranked themes, resolve a conflict with cited research, and leave with a prioritized plan. Tap around — it's live.
It starts on the synthesis view — 32 scattered comments organized into five ranked themes — and lets you explore every part of the product from the sidebar.